Curriculum Construction – Week 4 – Reading Notes

Short summary of Ralph Tyler’s Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction

  • Four fundamental questions to be answered when developing any curriculum
    • What educational purposes should the school seek to attain?
    • What educational experiences can be provided that are likely to attain these purposes?
    • How can these educational experiences be effectively organized?
    • How can we determine whether these purposes are being attained? (Tyler, 1950, 1-2)
  • Content and ideologically agnostic

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding By Design. (Expanded 2nd edition) Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. pp. 13-34, and 105-133.

  • Three stages of backwards design & Template
    • Identify desired results
      • Established Goals
      • Essential Questions
      • Understandings: Students will understand that…
      • Students will know
    • Determine acceptable evidence
      • Performance tasks
      • Other Evidence
    • Plan learning experiences and instruction
      • Learning Activities
        • W = help the students know Where the unit is going and What is expected. Help the teacher know Where the students are coming from (prior knowledge, interests…)
        • H = Hook all students and Hold the interests
        • E = Equip students, help them Experience the key ideas and Explore the issues
        • R = Provide opportunities to Rethink and Revise the understandings and work
        • E = Allow students to Evaluate their work and its implications
        • T = Be Tailored (personalized) to the different needs, interests, and abilities of learners
        • O = Be Organized to maximize initial and sustained engagement as well as effective learning
  • Standards contribute to the design work in 3 ways:
    • As a reference point during design
    • For use in self-assessment and peer reviews of draft designs
    • For quality control of completed designs
  • The UbD design matrix (column headers with rows for each stage of backwards design)
    • Key Design Questions
    • Chapters of the Book
    • Design Considerations
    • Filmes (Design Criteria)
    • What the Final Design Accomplishes
  • Essential Questions: Doorways to Understanding
    • Four connotations of what an essential question is:
      • Important questions that recur throughout all our lives
      • Core ideas and inquiries within a discipline
      • Helps students effectively inquire and make sense
      • Will most engage a specific and diverse set of learners
    • The importance of intent – not only the question has to be essential but the intent of it should be clear
    • Topical vs Overarching questions
      • Topical are more content specific questions
      • Overarching are generalized question about the content
      • Define the intent then create overarching and topical questions
  • Question starters based on the Six Facets of Understanding
    • Explanation
    • Interpretation
    • Application
    • Perspective
    • Empathy
    • Self-knowledge
  • Crafting Understandings
    • Examples and non-examples of understanding
    • Definition
      • Inference stated as specific and useful generalization
      • Transferable – enduring value beyond a specific topic
      • Abstract, counterintuitive, and easily misunderstood ideas
      • Acquired by ‘uncovering’ and ‘doing’ – developed inductively, coconstructed by learners, using ideas is realistic setting and with real-world problems
      • Summarizes important strategic principles in skill areas
    • Topical and overarching understandings
    • Understandings vs Factual Knowledge

Mukai, G. (2000). Anatomy of a Curriculum Development Project. Unpublished paper. Stanford Program on International and Cross- Cultural Education. pp. 1-21.

  • Example of curriculum for teaching migration, looking at Japanese migration in the Americas as a base
  • Sections of the curriculum design process
    • Needs assessment
    • Conceptualizations
      • Activities
      • Organizing Questions
      • Objectives
      • Strategies
      • Materials
      • Assessment
    • Curriculum Research and Writing
      • Multiple intelligences
        • Verbal-linguistic intelligence
        • Logical-mathematical intelligence
        • Spatial intelligence
        • Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence
        • Musical intelligence
        • Interpersonal intelligence
        • Intrapersonal intelligence
      • Small group activities
      • Constructivism
        • Teachers seek and value their student’s points of view
        • Classroom activities challenge student’s suppositions
        • Teachers pose problems of emerging relevance
        • Teachers build lessons around primary concepts and ‘big’ ideas
        • Teachers asses student learning in the context of daily teaching
      • Emphasis on multiple perspectives, balance, and diversity in exploring any issue
      • Utilizing content experts and teachers
    • Evaluation
      • Edit curriculum for particular context
    • Dissemination
      • Spread the word

Gardner, H. (1999). The Disciplined Mind. New York: Penguin Books. pp. 115-137.

  • Designing Education for Understanding
    • University of Phoenix – designed to get a job
  • Plan backwards – determine what kind of person you want to produce, then design education accordingly
  • Neither breadth nor depth – but understanding the underlying principles of a discipline
  • Difficulties of Understanding – need deep content knowledge from teacher
  • Obstacles to Understanding – erroneous engravings on a young child’s mind – hard to change
  • Disciplinary Expertise
  • Four Approaches to Understanding
    • Learning from Suggestive Institutions
    • Direct Confrontations of Erroneous Concepts
    • A Framework That Facilitates Understanding
      • Performance of understanding – how to assess it?
    • Multiple Entry Point to Understanding
  • Other players
    • Well-trained, Enthusiastic Teachers
    • Students Prepared and Motivated to Learn
    • Technology as Helper
    • Supportive Community

Beyond Bits and Atoms – Week 4 – Maker Space Observation

Screen Shot 2016-01-27 at 11.46.04 AM.pngWent to Barron Elementary School today to observe their Maker Space. Barron is a public school with around 300 students – supposedly the ‘

poorest’ school in the district… if this is the poorest, I cannot imagine what the richest schools look like!

We spoke to the incredible Smita Kolhatkar who idealized and implemented the Maker Space in the school – now all schools in the district are using her work as a model. Inspiring. Here’s her 1to1 iPad blog and her EdTech blog.

Now off to write the report on the visit.

IMG_1880.JPGIMG_1881.JPGIMG_1882.JPGIMG_1883.JPGIMG_1884.JPGIMG_1885.JPGIMG_1886.JPGIMG_1887.JPG

 

Curriculum Construction – Week 4 – Class Notes

Great class again lead by our ‘master-teacher’ Denise Pope.

  • Housekeeping
    • Group sites – arrange a meeting
    • Write your Curriculum Rationale (see photo)
    • Be aware of your site’s ideology for curriculum construction
    • 1 to 2 pages – max 3 pages
  • Definition of Understanding
    • Being able to explain it
    • Apply underlying concepts onto other situations or disciplines
  • Has to be hands-on but even more so minds-on

During class we practiced create “Essential Questions” and “Essential Understandings” for a hypothetical lesson on the US Bill Of Rights

IMG_1931.JPG

IMG_1932.JPG

IMG_1929.JPGIMG_1930.JPG


Assignment for next week – Curriculum Rationale

IMG_1928.JPG

After class our group (Celine Zhagn, Lisa Jiang, Mohamad Haj Hasan) went to speak to Allison O’Hair from the Graduate School of Business (GSB). She is helping redesign their Data and Decisions course for next winter incorporating a blended-learning approach. It is a perfect opportunity for us the help design a curriculum at its conception. 

 

EdClub – dinner at my place

Edrick, Camila, James, Sherry, and Corinne came over to my place to talk about EdTech Adoption in schools. Cooked Chicken Stogonoff for the first time following some YouTube recipees – it worked! Adopting EdTech in the house – that’s what I did 🙂

And here’s the aftermath 🙂

Great discussion guys!

IMG_1878.JPG

Brazilian Education – Week 4 – Class Notes

We had the honor to have one of the authors from – “Educational Performance of the Poor: Lessons from Rural Northeast Brazil” by Harbison and Hanushek (1992) and David Plank who wrote a review about the book. 

The book covers the socioeconomic context of the Northeast at the time (1981-1987), and the challenges faced in the implementation and evaluation of the EDURURAL Project. 

Very interesting discussion. Main take-aways:

  • They were unable to find a relation between student performance and the teacher’s educational level or years of experience – the conclusion is that, at least quantitatively, it is impossible to pinpoint what a good teacher is – it seems like it is an art.
  • Pouring money into education works if it is to build schools but no one really know how to spend this money once it comes down to improving the quality of education.
  • Brazil has come a long way in educational infrastructure but now it’s time to talk about quality.

IMG_1877.JPG

Teacher PD – Week 4 – Class Notes

Today we went over the research papers we read about Math PD. We reconstructed the LHS framework through the lens of different researchers – hard mental exercice but gave us a good grip on the different foci each one has.

  • Differentiation amongst teachers
    • “Students of treatment teachers whose mathematics knowledge was below that threshold did worse than students of control teachers with comparable knowledge.” (Givvin & Santagata, 2011, p.445)
  • Requirement to do the PD
    • Research
      • + More data
      • – Less engagement
  • Change from one year to the other
  • Pre-diagnose the teachers

IMG_1875.JPG

IMG_1873.JPG

IMG_1874.JPG