Category Archives: LDT – GSE – Stanford

Engineering Education – Week 1 – Reading Notes

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Opening Quote:
    • Learning depends solely on the student. Teacher only influences what the student does to learn.
    • “Learning results from what the student does and thinks and only from what the student does and thinks. The teacher can advance learning only by influencing what the student does to learn.” (Ambrose et al, 2010, p.1)
  • Research and practice
    • “Instructors need a bridge between research and practice, between teaching and learning.” (Ambrose et al, 2010, p.4)
  • Common thread for student learning
    • Why certain teaching approaches are or are not supporting students’ learning?
    • Generate or refine teaching approaches and strategies that more effectively foster student learning in specific contexts.
    • Transfer and apply these principles to new courses.
  • What is learning?
    • A process that leads to change
      • Learning is a process, not a product. But can only be measured from products or performances
      • Involves long-term change of knowledge, beliefs, behaviors, or attitudes
      • Not done to students, rather something they do themselves
  • Principles of Learning
    • Students’ prior knowledge can help or hinder learning
    • How students organize knowledge influences how they learn and apply what they know.
    • Students’ motivation determines, directs, and sustains what they do to learn.
    • To develop mastery, students must acquire component skills, practice integrating them, and know when to apply what they have learned.
    • Goal-directed practice coupled with targeted feedback enhances the quality of students’ learning.
    • Students’ current level of development interacts with the social, emotional, and intellectual climate of the course to impact learning.
    • To become self-directed learners, students must learn to monitor and adjust their approaches to learning.
  • Generic principles
    • Domain-independent
    • Experience-independent
    • Cross-culturally relevant

Mental Notes:

  • Generalizable framework for learning is very useful especially now that anyone can become a teacher, share knowledge, or explain situations more clearly. Communication is education.

Nathan, M. J., & Wagner Alibali, M. (2010). Learning sciences. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(3), 329-345.

  • Learning Sciences’ main themes
    • Bridging the Divide between Research and Practice
    • Limitations of Theories of Learning to Prescribe and Assess Instruction
    • Analyzing and Assessing Interventions Using Experimental and Design-Based Approaches
    • Addressing Learning and Behavior of the Individual in Interaction
  • Methods
    • From macro to micro
    • Scale-up than scale down
    • Systemic approach to complement elemental approach
  • Multidisciplinary
    • Cognitive
    • Developmental psychology
    • Educational psychology
    • Education
    • Computer science
    • Neuroscience
    • Anthropology
    • Social linguistics
    • Sociology
  • Eduneering
    • design, implement, evaluate, and redesign innovative learning approaches and tools
  • LS – Learning Sciences
    • Modern and Postmodern views of human behavior
      • Postmodernists base on ‘Critical Theory’ where they critique and change society, rather than explain it
        • Looks at assumptions and implications on a larger context
    • Constructivism and socio-cultural theory
    • Cognitive science rejected behaviorist’s reduction of mental events to observed phenomena
      • “In LS, postmodern influences are apparent in basic theoretical constructs: knowledge is sometimes viewed from the epistemology of social and radical constructivism and its situated and distributed nature is emphasized; learning is framed as changes in discourse and participation within communities, and as problem-based and project-based; and transfer is recast as preparation for future learning and in agent-centered terms that address the perceptual and conceptual generalizations constructed by the learner rather than from the viewpoint of the domain expert.” (Nathan & Wagner, 2010, p.2)
  • Bridging the Divide between Research and Practice
    • From artificial to authentic settings
    • “Incompatibilities between research and practice can be framed as a mismatch between levels of granularity of the phenomena of interest.” (Nathan & Wagner, 2010, p.3)
    • Teachers, the main beneficiaries of cognitive theories, need to learn how to apply these concepts.
  • Limitations of Theories of Learning to Prescribe and Assess Instruction
    • Elemental studies provide great frameworks but are limiting when applied to authentic settings
      • “The general point is that, on its own, an elemental approach to the study of learning faces enormous challenges of scaling up when the scientific work is called upon for application to authentic settings.” (Nathan & Wagner, 2010, p.4)
    • Has to scale up and down – from students to national policy levels
    • All have to be involved and collaborate
  • Analyzing and Assessing Interventions Using Experimental and Design-Based Approaches (eduneering)
    • Experimental designs: control groups and random assignments
      • Internal validity and causal inference
      • Low ecological validity – unnatural adaptation of tasks
      • Looking at a limited set of variables – could be missing something important
    • Design oriented philosophy (engineering design)
      • “Expanded tool kit of data collection and analysis methods” (Nathan & Wagner, 2010, p.5)
      • “Design-based research provides for flexibility of interventions and faster means of innovation—similar to what Koedinger [p. 8] refers to as ‘the hare of intuitive design’—which can be complementary to the incremental approach of experimental research—Koedinger’s ‘tortoise of cumulative science’.“ (Nathan & Wagner, 2010, p.5)
  • Addressing Learning and Behavior of the Individual in Interaction (in interaction)
    • Context and setting
    • Affordances of objects in the world
    • Embodied knowledge grounded in experiences in the physical world
    • Knowledge distributed among members of a group and tools
    • Social interactions, including shared objects and representations
    • Positioning within the participation structure
    • Shared intentionality and intersubjectivity
    • Cultural, ethnic, and class influences
  • Time scales of human behavior
    • 10 ms: biological (primarily neural)
    • 100 ms to 10s: cognitive band: perceptual and motor processes: word and object recognition to brief communicative exchanges.
    • Minutes to hours: planful, interpersonal and task oriented
    • Hours to days: social and developmental operations, classroom or on-the-job training
    • Months and beyond: organizational, developmental, generational, and cultural terms
  • Trans-scale research

Mental Notes:

  • Learning Science is profoundly interdisciplinary and vast in reach. Culmination of theories, research methods, design approaches, and implementation strategies.

Spring Quarter started!

After a well deserved break, here we are again ready for the third quarter. The course line up is a lot lighter, but the pressure to advance the Master’s project and think about the future is exponentially bigger now. All going according to plan 🙂

This quarter I will be taking the following courses + an internship!

EDUC 391 – Engineering Education and Online Learning
“A project based introduction to web-based learning design. In this course we will explore the evidence and theory behind principles of learning design and game design thinking. In addition to gaining a broad understanding of the emerging field of the science and engineering of learning, students will experiment with a variety of educational technologies, pedagogical techniques, game design principles, and assessment methods. Over the course of the quarter, interdisciplinary teams will create a prototype or a functioning piece of educational technology.”

EDUC 404: Topics in Brazilian Education: Public Policy and Innovation for the 21st Century
“The objective of this seminar is to provide students from different backgrounds an opportunity to learn about current issues and debates on Brazilian education. The seminar will cover topics on the history of Brazilian education; an overview of current school reforms at the federal level; educational assessments; education and economic growth; educational equity; teacher labor market; technology and education; early childhood; and higher education to Brazil.”

EDUC 407: Lytics Seminar
“This course is a survey of research methods with applications in online learning. The methods covered are very interdisciplinary, including an introduction to machine learning, text/discourse analysis, causal modeling, and psychometrics. Broader question in research methodology are also covered, including how to formulate a good research question, when to use qualitative or quantitative methods, and the relative merits of theory-driven confirmatory vs. exploratory research. The goal of this course is to support researchers in the online learning space and other fields in their research endeavors.”

EDUC 229C: Learning Design and Technology Seminar
“Four-quarter required seminar for the LDT master’s program. Discussions and activities related to designing for learning with technology. Support for internships and Master’s project. Theoretical and practical perspectives, hands-on development, and collaborative efforts. (LDT)”

EDUC 215: LDT Internship Workshop
“The required internship is a cornerstone of the LDT program. This course will provide students an opportunity to link their academic learning to real world experience through in-class discussions, presentations, and reflective writing. It will allow the program director to monitor the quality of the experience and provide timely advice and support as needed for an optimal learning experience. The course will meet several times each quarter, adjacent to LDT seminar (Fridays, 12-1). An internship agreement will be required at the beginning of the course signed by the faculty advisor), as well as a reflection paper at the end of the course. Students will take the course for 1 unit, unless they request additional units for unpaid internship hours.”

The internship is right here at Stanford, at The Office of the Vice Provost for Teaching and Learning (VPTL) working with the Director of Instructional Design to update the course on how to create online courses for Stanford professors. Very exciting! Already started on Monday and will be doing only 8 hours a week – which is what my Visa allows.

Teacher PD – Final Paper

That’s it! Last deliverable of the quarter completed!

This was a big one: 67% of the grade.

Here’s the prompt and below my response:

Final Paper

For this paper you will study in-depth a professional development program (or set of programs with similar foci) of your choosing and write a paper describing and analyzing that program(s). Be sure to select a program for which research has been conducted and reports of that research are available. Your paper should address the following topics:

  • Nature of the professional development program
  • Underlying assumptions about teaching and teacher learning
  • Summary of research conducted on the professional development program (research questions, methods, findings, conclusions)
  • Your analysis of strengths and limitations of the professional development program
  • Your analysis of strengths and limitations of the research on the PD program
  • Suggestions for future program development and research

We anticipate that the papers will need to be 15-20 pages in length to adequately address the list above. They should be written in either APA or Chicago style. APA style, described in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, is the format used in the large majority of educational publications, including most of the readings for this course. Chicago style, described in the Chicago Manual of Style, is used in chapters from yearbooks of the National Society for the Study of Education.

Possible professional development programs to study:

(This list is a collection of suggestions, not an exhaustive or complete list. We encourage you to identify a PD program in your area of interest.)

  • Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development; Learning and Teaching Geometry (Seago and colleagues)
  • Cognitively-Guided Instruction (original: Carpenter, Fennema, Franke & colleagues; more recent incarnations: Franke & Kazemi, Phillips & colleagues)
  • Video clubs (Sherin, van Es, and colleagues)
  • National Writing Project
  • Hollyhock Fellowship (CSET)
  • Partnerships for Reform in Secondary Science and Mathematics (PRiSSM; Nelson, Slavit & colleagues)
  • Project PRIME (Carlson & Gess-Newsome)
  • The Danielson Group: Promoting Teacher Effectiveness and Professional Learning
  • Online Teacher Professional Development (there are several programs; you might want to review a subset of them.)

Response:

LDT Seminar – Winter Quarter Reflection

Prompt: 

  1. Evaluate your own contributions to seminar based on the rubric below.
  2. Explore your own learning inside and outside of class in a brief reflection paper (1-2 pages).

LDT SEMINAR RUBRIC

Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Attendance* Misses two or more seminars. Comes late or leaves early. Does not inform instructor of absence in advance. Attends all of seminar, or misses one, with very good excuse (e-mailed to instructor ahead of time). Always on time. Organizes extra learning opportunities for other learners.
Assignments** Assignments are late, incomplete, or poorly executed. Assignments are turned in on time. All outside work is turned in on time (or ahead of time). Assignments address the assignment components, but appear rushed or have errors. In-class and out-of-class assignments are completed thoughtfully and thoroughly. In out-of-class work, attention is paid to content, spelling, grammar, and flow.
Participation Rarely speaks, or rarely listens. Carries on side conversations or other off- topic activities (for example on the computer). Mostly listens, but speaks sometimes. Or mostly speaks, but listens sometimes. Speaks and listens actively in class. Builds on the ideas of others. Challenges own thinking and that of others. Seeks to make connections between concepts in class and to outside experiences.

Response

Teacher PD – Final Presentation

After a very long weekend of deep research and exploration into Online Teacher Professional Development, I finalized the presentation and delivered to the class. It was well received with a high point commentary from Janet (professor) that “it is a very challenging topic  that was well explored and presented.”

Here it is:

Teacher PD – Final – Research Notes

oTPD (Online Teacher Professional Development

NGSX – Next Generation Science Exemplar System for Professional Development

History

  • June 2012 started partnering with
    • School districts
    • State departments of education
    • Informal science education providers
    • Math/science partnerships
    • 9 states to pilot the beta version of the NGSX
      • “Argumentation, Explanation, and Modeling the Behavior of Matter.”
  • The Mosakowski Institute for Public Enterprise at Clark University
  • Sarah Michaels: Clark University and Tidemark Institute Associate
  • Jean Moon: Tidemark Institute
  • Brian J. Reiser: Northwestern University and Tidemark Institute Associate

Target

  • K-12 Science Education
  • Based on National Research Council’s (NRC) “A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas”

Description

  • “NGSX (Next Generation Science Exemplar System) is a face-to-face learning environment, in which the participants in a study group draw on an on-line system that poses tasks for each session and provides rich cases, supportive materials, and scaffolding tools to guide the work.”
  • “teachers support students in using science and engineering practices to develop, apply, and refine disciplinary and crosscutting ideas. Teachers engage in these practices and investigate classroom cases to explore how to bring these approaches into their own classrooms.”
  • 3 hour units
  • Period of 10 weeks
  • Facilitator has his or her laptop connected to a projector for the group to view video and task prompts embedded in the site.
  • An introductory video
    • a teacher, scientist, or researcher
    • theme for the unit
      • Nature of modeling
      • Support for classroom discourse
      • Difficulties students face in reasoning about the nature of matter
  • Include classroom cases to analyze
    • 5 min clips of teachers and students engaged in modeling practices
    • Prompts for discussion
      • Modeling tasks
      • Student thinking
      • Teaching strategies
    • Work to do between sessions
      • Readings about the science practices
      • Readings about students’ learning of the subject matter
      • Directions to try out aspects of what they have learned in the participants’ own classrooms

Professional learning system

  • Digital resources
  • Guided activities
  • Interactivity with colleagues

Encourages a mix of participants

  • K-12 teachers
  • Administrators
  • Science coaches
  • Higher education pre-service faculty

Major ideas

  • NRC Framework
  • Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)

Theoretical Underpinning

  • Community of inquiry framework

Research Tool

  • 3D learning
  • Enactment in classroom

Learning pathway for facilitators

  • Create and support a knowledge-building culture
  • Teacher leaders, coaches, and PD providers
  • Model of peer-leadership in PD that scales

NGSX Design Approach

  • Instead of learning about NGSS, teachers are learning to teach with NGSS
    • Organize PD around teacher sensemaking of classroom cases
    • Focus on high leverage practices: engaging in argumentation to develop and use explanatory models.
    • Organize teacher study groups working to apply reforms to their own practice
    • Combine focus on science, student thinking, and pedagogy
    • Develop capacity for peer-led facilitation

NGSX Pathways

  • Argumentation, Explanation, and Modeling the Behavior of Matter: Supports teacher learning about modeling, argumentation and explanation in the context of disciplinary core ideas about the nature of matter.
    • Units 1-3: Modeling and three-dimensional learning. Teachers develop and use models to explain matter phenomena (science) and explore how this reflects the shifts in the Framework and NGSS (science pedagogy).
    • Unit 4: Analyzing classroom cases to learn to build a discourse community to support modeling, argumentation, and explanation (student learning, science pedagogy).
    • Unit 5: Teachers analyze a high school classroom case of student developing and refining models to explain air pressure phenomena (student learning, science pedagogy).
    • Unit 6: Teachers analyze a middle school classroom case of students engaging in argumentation to develop particle model of matter (student learning, science pedagogy).
    • Units 7-8: Taking it back to our own classrooms: Teachers work in teams to adapt existing instructional units to integrate science and engineering practices (science pedagogy). (Currently a face to face workshop, now being embedded in two NGSX units)
  • The Facilitator Pathway: Supports facilitation strategies to guide productive discussion in teacher study groups, and to help teachers grapple with the challenges of incorporating three dimensional learning into their own classrooms.
  • Additional pathways targeted for development include a pathway in life sciences in which teachers learn to support students in argumentation, explanation, and modeling population interactions and natural selection.

More Research

NGSX:

Penuel, W. R. (2015). Infrastructuring As a Practice for Promoting Transformation and Equity in Design-Based Implementation Research.

  • Some teachers took went through some of the NGSX sessions
  • Challenges of research
    • High turnover in large districts
    • Shifting assignments with disregard to teacher’s background or experience
    • “These lead not just to high levels of attrition in research studies; they undercut investments by district and school leaders in subject-matter focused initiatives aimed at improving teaching and learning (Shear & Penuel, 2010).” (Penal, 2015)

Smart, S. T. E. M., & Schools, L. L. F. S. (2016). Teaching and Learning Under the Next Generation Science Standards.

  • Two initiatives combine technology-enabled case analysis within a study-group format
    • Science Teachers Learning through Lesson Analysis (STeLLA)
    • NGSX

TAPED IN:

Fusco, J., Gehlbach, H., & Schlager, M. (2000). Assessing the impact of a large-scale online teacher professional development community. InSociety for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Vol. 2000, No. 1, pp. 2178-2183).

  • TAPED IN
    • closed in 2013
    • Recommends EdModo
  • Full research on this – maybe use this as the focus?

Fusco, J., Haavind, S., Remold, J., & Schank, P. (2011). Exploring differences in online professional development seminars with the community of inquiry framework. Educational Media International, 48(3), 139-149.

  • 4 sessions of 2 professional development seminars were offered to members of an organization.
  • The seminars were voluntary, free of charge, and participants did not receive credit for their attendance
  • Community of inquiry framework
    • Essential elements of an educational experience:
      • Social presence
        • How members share and interact
      • Cognitive presence
        • Engaging with the content:
          • Brainstorming
          • Exploring topics
          • Integrating information
          • Constructing understanding
          • Reflection and dialogue about understandings.
      • Teaching presence
        • Sustains the learning experience
        • Encourages inquiry
        • Consists of:
          • Design
          • Facilitation
          • Direct instruction
  • Findings
    • First year
      • Did not figure out how to motivate participants
    • Second year
      • Corrected with more interventions
      • Demonstrated the importance of seminar leader or facilitator
      • Initial activities must provide easy success
      • Motivated participants help increase social and cognitive presence in inquiry discussions
      • Social presence = higher satisfaction ratings
    • Supports CoI framework as a planning tool for the development of seminars

Farooq, U., Schank, P., Harris, A., Fusco, J. & Schlager, M. (2007). Sustaining a community computing infrastructure for online teacher professional development: A case study of designing Tapped In. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16(4-5), 397-429. Norwell, MA: Klewer Academic Publishers.

  • Design principles used to design 4 interventions on Tapped In
    • Amy Jo Kim’s (2000) design principles that characterize successful, sustainable online communities:
      • Build flexible, extensible gathering places.
      • Design for a range of roles.
      • Develop a strong leadership program
      • Facilitate member-run subgroups
      • Create and maintain feedback loops
  • Conceptual components utilized:
    • Multiple interaction formats and technologies.
      • Support work practices of large numbers of different groups
      • Enable users to know with whom they are interacting and what is going on around them
      • Allow users to create, store, and share discourse objects (e.g., notes, overhead slides)
      • Communicate in real time or asynchronously, as the need arises
      • Engage in group activities hosted by designers as well as their own circle of colleagues
    • Identity and trust.
    • Ownership and empowerment
    • Heterogeneity
    • Community management, leadership, and sustainability.
  • Research Method
    • Participatory design (PD)
      • Socio-technical systems theory (Mumford 1983)
        • Importance of including the membership of a community in the design process

Online PD Offerings:

ASCD: http://www.ascd.org/

  • Positive
    • Global and long standing
    • Members – constituents, journals, videos, conferences, institutes, onsite and online PD programs
    • Focused on PD
    • Wide range of content offering & well organized
      • What we teach
      • How we teach
      • Who we teach
      • How we lead
    • All modes
      • Online
      • On-Site
      • Blended
      • Literature
  • Negative
    • Could not find research done on it

Edmodo: https://www.edmodo.com

  • Positive
    • Many digital tools available
      • Classroom management
      • Calendar
      • Community creation tools
      • App marketplace
      • Integration to Cloud Services
  •  Negative
    • Now overarching teaching or learning framework
    • More of a tool than an set of learning resources
    • Poor quality of content materials

PBS TeacherLine: http://www.pbs.org/teacherline/

  • Positive
    • Facilitated and self-paced
    • Beginning and experienced teachers
    • Research based
    • Award winning
  • Negative
    • Graduate & CEU credits upon verification of a higher-ed institute
    • Only one research partner
    • Free course had no videos – just basically formatted text
    • Old fashioned navigation

ReadWriteThink http://www.readwritethink.org

  • Positive
    • Marketplace for resources
      • Classroom resources
      • Parent & Afterschool resources
      • Links to Online PD programs
    • Strong partnerships
      • NCTE
  • Negative
    • Very little videos
    • Little content
    • No community building tool

The University of North Dakota: PD for Educators http://educators.und.edu

  • Positive
    • Marketplace for several online PD programs

Intel Education: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/education/intel-education.html

  • Self-paced but old-school

Annenberg Learner http://learner.org

  • All free material
  • Tons of content
  • Well organized
  • All modes

Library of Congress: http://www.loc.gov/teachers/professionaldevelopment/

  • Free content
  • Limited online self-paced material
  • Mostly PDFs

TeacherFirst http://www.teachersfirst.com/

  • Free resources
  • Links to several other providers

University of the Pacific http://www.pacific.edu/Academics/Professional-and-Continuing-Education/Courses-for-Teachers.html

  • Several courses online self-paced

University of Phoenix http://www.phoenix.edu

  • All online

University of Wisconsin STOUT http://www.uwstout.edu/soe/profdev/courses.cfm

  • Online Graduate Course

Professional Development Institute https://www.webteaching.com

  • Online PD + tools to be used in the classroom

Sophia https://www.sophia.org/professional-development

  • Online PD

Harvard GSE Online Programs https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ppe/programs/online

The Teacher’s Academy http://www.theteachersacademy.com

The Heritage Institute http://www.hol.edu

CE Credits Online http://www.cecreditsonline.org/

International Baccalaureate Online PD http://www.ibo.org/professional-development/which-type-of-training-is-right-for-me/online-pd/

Adam State University Colorado https://www.adams.edu/extended_studies/professional-development/

TeachingChannel https://www.teachingchannel.org/

PepperPD https://www.pepperpd.com/ in association with WestEd https://www.wested.org/)

Professional Learning Board http://k12teacherstaffdevelopment.com/tlb/

TeachMe PD http://www.teachmeceus.com

San Francisco State University https://cel.sfsu.edu/education

Stanford Center for Professional Development http://scpd.stanford.edu/

LDT Seminar – Week 10 – Class Notes

Due to the success of Graph Learner in the BBA Expo and my enthusiasm towards building and evolving the app, I voiced my temptation of switching my Master’s Project to it.

The LXD platform aims at creating virtual agents that help instructors along the process of creating online courses. It is a very interesting problem to tackle but has a limited scope in so far as scale and potential impact.

Graph Learner on the other hand could impact a much wider population, it’s scalable, has the potential for a real revenue stream, and teaches essential skills needed by all students and even adults.

“Pay attention to what you are enthusiastic about,” said one of my colleagues.

So this is what I will be reflecting upon over the Spring Break 🙂

LXS vs. Graph Learner.